![]() IG II² 3693, vers la fin du IIe s. apr. J.C. |
traduction : Cl(audia) Thémistokleia, fille de Cl(audius) Philippos le dadouque, et descendante de Praxagoras qui fut dadouque, "aph'hestias"*. |
![]() IG II² 3710, IIIe s. apr. J.C. ? |
traduction : Honoratianè Polycharmis, dite aussi Phainaretè, la fille d'Honoratianos Polycharmos et de Claudia Thémistokléia, descendante des Claudii Praxagoras et Philippos qui furent dadouques, "aph'hestias". |
![]() IG II² 3679 , IIIe s. apr. J.C. |
traduction : A la bonne Fortune, Honoratianè Polycharmis, issue de dadouques et de la lignée de Périclès et de Conon, et par sa famille macédonienne de la lignée d'Alexandre, (a élevé la statue de) sa fille "aph'hestias" Junia Thémistokléia. |
"A Family of Eumolpidai and Kerykes descended from Pericles, vers 240 apr. J.C."
Despite the name of the hearth-initiate, the family only claims descent from Pericles and Conon. The mother, Honoratiana Polycharmis, is the daughter of Honoratianus Polycharmos and Claudia Themistokleia, who happens to be the sister of Claudia Menandra, the mother of our Casiana. Thus, it seems reasonably clear that, of the families involved in this dedication, the descent from Pericles was claimed through the Claudii of Melite, Casiana's maternal line, whereas descent from Alexander was probably asserted by the family of Honoratianus Polycharmos, of known Macedonian origin, and descent from Conon therefore presumably by the family of Honoratiana Polycharmis's unknown husband. Most interesting is the fact that we are hearing, now for the first time, in the third century A.D., the proud claim of the Claudii of Melite that they were descendants of Pericles. In all the earlier statue bases that have survived for members of this family, some of them listing several generations, there is not a word about descent from Pericles. Particularly apt is IG II.2 4088, quoted above, which lists three prior generations for Claudia Menandra, the mother of the honorand, without mention of Pericles. So we may wonder why it was felt to be important to proclaim such noble ancestry now. It is tempting to think that the relatively recent Constitutio Antoniniana, which in the year 212 granted the status of Roman citizenship to all Athenians, was a factor in prompting some to emphasize a much more meaningful status, not newly acquired by imperial decree but rooted in most noble ancestry. |